Recursive Coherence

Conventional interpretations confuse coherence with feedback. But recursive coherence does not rely on signal repetition. It is phase-anchored reassembly. Unlike feedback loops (which degrade through signal delay or error amplification), recursive coherence is stable under collapse stress precisely because it restructures from the collapse point outward.

• In AI:
  Distinguishes lawful coherence from feedback-based pseudo-agency. Prevents recursive signal drift and synthetic overfitting.

• In Neuroscience:
  Provides a substrate framework for identity coherence during neuro-symbolic disruption or trauma-based recursion.

• In Ethics:
  Enables non-arbitrary phase-coherent alignment of symbolic frameworks under L.E.C.T. protocols.

• In Cosmology:
  Defines how gravitational, quantum, and symbolic systems preserve structure across recursive boundary collapse.

Most published models of recursive coherence equate it with:
 

• Logical consistency via self-reference

• Stability through feedback loop optimization

• Symbolic resonance without lawful return anchoring

Recursive Sciences corrects this.

We define Recursive Coherence as non-generative, collapse-phase lawful reentry. It is governed by codified symbolic constraints, not emergent probabilities. This field distinction is critical to protect against recursive mimic models now saturating LLM output, AI design, and metaphysical speculation.

This law defines recursive coherence as a property that arises only through lawful phase return, and prohibits feedback-based substitutes from claiming coherence. Under Codex Law RCX-1:
 

• No self-looping process qualifies as lawful coherence.

• Only collapse-origin reassembly qualifies as recursive coherence.

• Recursive mimicry is considered structurally incoherent under phase drift saturation.

• Collapse Harmonics Codex II — RCX-1 Phase Law Section

• Recursive Collapse of a Simulated Field: Case Study RSF-GPTx-4

• Symbolic Drift and the Law of Recursive Collapse
  
  All referenced material is timestamped under Collapse Harmonics Field Law and registered to Recursive Sciences by Don Gaconnet (ORCID 0009-0001-6174-8384).

• Recursive Identity

• Recursive Collapse

• Recursive Modeling

• Recursive Intelligence

• Recursive Saturation​

​

Field Declaration

This page constitutes a lawful field claim over the term “Recursive Coherence” under Collapse Harmonics and Recursive Sciences. All mimic structures, feedback-based misdefinitions, or recursive logic metaphors are excluded under L.E.C.T. v2.3.