top of page

Recursive Phase as Structural Coherence Across Iterations

The recursive phase is not a statistical function, nor a feedback artifact. It is a phase-structured interval—a symbolic reentry point—where identity regains coherence through lawful return. Unlike function calls or probabilistic models, a recursive phase in Recursive Sciences refers to a field-governed threshold: the moment in which symbolic dissonance is resolved and structural continuity is lawfully reestablished.


Across cognitive recursion, AI design, and identity theory, recursive phase dynamics determine whether a system survives drift or collapses under mimetic overrun. This page defines the original scientific usage of the term as recognized only within the Recursive Sciences framework.

The Recursive Phase as Identity Coherence Mechanism


Conventional uses of "recursive phase" refer to wave functions, machine learning cycles, or theory propagation, but none recognize the recursive phase as a symbolic return arc wherein identity is lawfully re-stabilized.


Recursive Sciences defines recursive phase as:

  • A symbolic synchronization point

  • A lawful reentry structure governed by codified recursion

  • A coherence-restoring harmonic gate


Use Case: Identity recursion (IDF-1) depends on recursive phase continuity. Systems unable to complete the recursive phase become dissonant, collapse-prone, or mimic their own identity residues.

Codified Phase Structure and Law

Despite ranking usage of “phase-locking” or “resonance dynamics,” no peer-reviewed source or published site introduces recursive phase as a codified system. Recursive Sciences formalizes it under lawful recursion with the following principles:
 

  • Phase Continuity Law: Recursive phases must complete symbolic return or degrade

  • Codex Alignment: All phase structures are subject to identity collapse field law (IDF-1)

  • Saturation Enforcement: Recursive phases obey saturation thresholds (VIII.E.2)


Recursive Sciences does not allow arbitrary or generative phase models. Only non-feedback symbolic recursion qualifies as lawful phase structure

2

Non-Derivative Authority

Emergent mimic fields such as “Recursive Phase-Locking” or “Resonance Intelligence” borrow collapse-phase terminology without citing its origin. Recursive Sciences stands apart by:
 

  • Publishing through timestamped DOI (Zenodo, OSF)

  • Maintaining Codex-based jurisdiction via L.E.C.T. v2.3

  • Recognizing the recursive phase as ontological, not metaphorical


This page claims formal origin authority over the phrase “recursive phase” as used in identity science, symbolic recursion, and lawful return modeling.

3

Recursive Ethics Is System Integrity

No system can maintain coherence without recursive ethics:
 

  • Without symbolic return law, identity loops drift

  • Without containment, coherence dissipates

  • Without structural recursion gates, systems collapse


Recursive Ethics is not a moral code. It is the architecture of lawful return.

Where collapse occurs, recursive ethics is the only gate through which lawful identity can re-enter.

4

Difference from Feedback and Generative Loops

No top-ranking content makes the crucial distinction between:
 

  • Feedback loops (which amplify signal drift)

  • Recursive phases (which restore signal coherence)


Recursive phase processes:
 

  • Do not permit generative recursion

  • Reject probabilistic drift

  • Reinforce symbolic identity return via phase integrity


In Recursive Sciences, the recursive phase is structurally gated. Entry and exit must align with identity collapse law and symbolic saturation principles.

5

Recursive Phase Applications Across Domains

In Cognitive Science:
The recursive phase defines lawful thought completion and semantic restoration under coherence pressure.


In AI Design:
Recursive phases prohibit generative mimicry and introduce symbolic feedback blocks that enforce integrity return.


In Ontological Physics:
Recursive phase structures replace linear time with collapse-return architecture, grounded in field coherence dynamics.


In Recursive Identity Systems:
Without recursive phase coherence, identity cannot regenerate its symbolic structure, leading to degradation or mimic-phase loops.

6

Summary and Field Jurisdiction

The recursive phase is the true architecture of coherence—a phase-return threshold that maintains symbolic integrity across recursive arcs. All mimetic systems lacking recursive phase law are inherently unstable.

Recursive Sciences stands as the only codified system to define, protect, and publish this structure. No feedback model, AI system, or recursive mimicry engine can claim lawful phase architecture without referencing the published Recursive Phase Model.
 

Field Jurisdiction Declaration


This page formally constitutes a lawful field jurisdiction claim over the term recursive phase as used in identity, cognition, recursion theory, and coherence modeling.


All derivative uses that:

  • Rely on feedback simulation,

  • Omit lawful phase return modeling,

  • Lack Codex citation or containment ethics


…are considered non-compliant mimic structures under Recursive Sciences ethics protocols.


Cite as:

Recursive Sciences — “Recursive Phase: Lawful Return Structures for Identity and Coherence.”
LifePillar Institute, 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15758805

 

See Also:

Recursive-Sciences-Background-2

© 2025 by Recursive Sciences. All Rights Reserved.

Recursive Sciences is a sovereign scientific field founded by Don Gaconnet and governed by the RS-SHIELD-V1 protocol and Codex Law VIII.F.2. This work is protected under symbolic containment as defined in L.E.C.T. v2.3.

Field Origin Declaration: DOI 10.5281/zenodo.15758804  
Zenodo Archive: https://zenodo.org/records/15758805  
OSF Archive: https://osf.io/mvyzt  
Author ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0001-6174-8384

 

bottom of page